Determining the Concentration of Morphine and Codeine in Poppy Seeds for Drug Test Defense
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55632/pwvas.v92i1.676Keywords:
Morphine, Codeine, Opiate ELISA, TLC, GC-MSAbstract
TRAVIS HARDING, MARK FLOOD, ANDREAS BAUR, and KRISTY HENSON. Department of Natural Sciences, Fairmont State University, Fairmont, WV, 26554. Determining the Concentration of Morphine and Codeine in Poppy Seeds for Drug Test Defense.
The purpose of this research was to determine the concentration of opiates, morphine and codeine, in poppy seeds in effort to combat the “poppy seed defense”. Morphine and codeine are naturally occurring substances belonging to a class of drugs labeled opioid analgesics, commonly known as narcotics. There has been an increase in concerns involving false-positive opiate drug test. Distinguishing between legitimate dietary poppy seed ingestion versus non-prescribed opiate or heroin abuse is important for individuals subject to routine drug testing. Poppy seeds were purchased from supermarkets and were mechanically ground up by either 1) a blender or 2) a mortar and pestle, which best simulates human mastication. The ground up seed products were placed in a solution matrix to simulate a human oral cavity (target concentration of 30 ng/mL). Morphine and codeine concentrations from the samples will be tested using Thin Layer Chromatography, immunoassay (Opiate ELISA), and a validated Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectroscopy (GC-MS) Selected Ion Monitoring (SIM) system. The screening cutoff concentration ranges from 0 ng/mL to 40 ng/mL. Preliminary results from previous constructed experiments showed a positive color change for the opiate assay from blue to yellow within one hour (National Institute on Drug Abuse Research). The average absorbance at a dual wavelength of 450 nm and 650 nm was 1.238 correlating to a morphine concentration of about 5.1 ng/mL. Initial GC-MS results showed morphine and internal standard morphine-D3 had mass to charge ratios of 432 m/z and 429 m/z with an average concentration of 7.5 ng/mL respectively. This research was made possible by NASA West Virginia Space Grant Consortium, Training Grant #NNX15AI01H.
References
Samano, K. L., Clouette, R. E., Rowland, B. J., & Sample, R. H. (2015). Concentrations of Morphine and Codeine in Paired Oral Fluid and Urine Specimens Following Ingestion of a Poppy Seed Roll and Raw Poppy Seeds. Journal of analytical toxicology, 39(8), 655–661. doi:10.1093/jat/bkv081
Hayes LW, Krasselt WG, Mueggler PA. Concentrations of morphine and codeine in serum and urine after ingestion of poppy seeds. Clin Chem 1987;33:806-808.
Meadway, C., George, S., & Braithwaite, R. (1998). Opiate concentrations following the ingestion of poppy seed products – evidence for `the poppy seed defence. Forensic Science International, 96(1), 29–38. doi: 10.1016/s0379-0738(98)00107-8
Kronstrand, R., & Jones, A. W. (2001). Concentration Ratios of Codeine-to-Morphine in Plasma after a Single Oral Dose (100 mg) of Codeine Phosphate. Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 25(6), 486–487. doi: 10.1093/jat/25.6.486
Niedbala, R. S., Kardos, K., Waga, J., Fritch, D., Yeager, L., Doddamane, S., & Schoener, E. (2001). Laboratory Analysis of Remotely Collected Oral Fluid Specimens for Opiates by Immunoassay. Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 25(5), 310–315. doi: 10.1093/jat/25.5.310
Rohrig, T. P., & Moore, C. (2003). The Determination of Morphine in Urine and Oral Fluid Following Ingestion of Poppy Seeds. Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 27(7), 449–452. doi: 10.1093/jat/27.7.449
Wong, R. C., Tran, M., & Tung, J. K. (2005). Oral fluid drug tests: Effects of adulterants and foodstuffs. Forensic Science International, 150(2-3), 175–180. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2005.02.023
Concheiro, M., Newmeyer, M. N., Costa, J. L. D., Flegel, R., Gorelick, D. A., & Huestis, M. A. (2014). Morphine and codeine in oral fluid after controlled poppy seed administration. Drug Testing and Analysis, 7(7), 586–591. doi: 10.1002/dta.1742
Elsohly, M. A., & Jones, A. B. (1995). Drug Testing in the Workplace: Could a Positive Test for One of the Mandated Drugs Be for Reasons Other Than Illicit Use of the Drug? Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 19(6), 450–458. doi: 10.1093/jat/19.6.450
Elsohly, H. N., Stanford, D. F., Jones, A. B., Elsohly, M. A., Snyder, H., & Pedersen, C. (1988). Gas Chromatographic/Mass Spectrometric Analysis of Morphine and Codeine in Human Urine of Poppy Seed Eaters. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 33(2). doi: 10.1520/jfs11948j
Bosker, W. M., and Huestis, M.A.,(2011). Oral fluid testing for drugs of abuse. Clinical Chemistry Journal, 55, 2009, 1910–31.
Washington, N., Washington C. and Wilson, C.G. (2014). Barriers to Drug Absorption, Physiological Pharmaceutics, Taylor and Francis, Inc., New York, 2001, NY ISBN 0-748- 40562-3.
George, C.F. (2003). Absorption, Distribution and Metabolism of Drugs; Effects of Disease of the Gut. Br. Med. Biomedical & Pharmacology Journal vol. 5(2), 2012, 367- 370. J., 2, 1976, 742-744.
Stephen, K.W. & Speirs, C.F.(2007). Methods for Collecting Individual Components of Mixed Saliva: The Relevance to Clinical Pharmacology. Br. J. Clinical Pharmacology Journal. 3, , 315- 319.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Proceedings of the West Virginia Academy of Science applies the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) license to works we publish. By virtue of their appearance in this open access journal, articles are free to use, with proper attribution, in educational and other non-commercial settings.